Teams

April's Angels

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.43 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-12-10vs AK-TAC-MortonLost 12
L#1 DoublesConita Mullett / Karen Loeffler vs Marlys Morton / Triin Minton3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesELIZE Rumley / Christie Wyzykowski vs Stacia Green / Marcia Howell2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Stone / Susan Brunner vs Denise Henderson / Leilah Hemmen6-4, 6-3
2025-11-23vs AK-TAC-MortonWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Loeffler / Conita Mullett vs Denise Henderson / Leilah Hemmen6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCatherine Stone / Christie Wyzykowski vs Marlys Morton / Triin Minton1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesApril Korshin / Susan Brunner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-12vs AK-TAC-MortonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesConita Mullett / April Korshin vs Triin Minton / Stacia Green1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Brunner / ELIZE Rumley vs Marcia Howell / Dana Griffin6-0, 6-1
2025-10-05vs AK-TAC-MortonLost 12
L#1 DoublesApril Korshin / Susan Brunner vs Dana Griffin / Denise Henderson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristie Wyzykowski / Karen Loeffler vs Triin Minton / Stacia Green1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Stone / Conita Mullett vs Marlys Morton / Leilah Hemmen6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Catherine Stone
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.81
April Korshin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
ELIZE Rumley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Karen Loeffler
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.02
Susan Brunner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.02
Conita Mullett
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.51
Christie Wyzykowski
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

April Korshin + ELIZE Rumley4554% games+3.9% vs expected
Susan Brunner + Conita Mullett51042% games+1.0% vs expected
Christie Wyzykowski + Susan Brunner4544% games−6.8% vs expected
Catherine Stone + April Korshin4358% gamesnot enough data
Christie Wyzykowski + Conita Mullett123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Stone
189W–51L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
April Korshin
113W–101L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
3.5
ELIZE Rumley
56W–59L career · type M · 5 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.67
3.5
Karen Loeffler
68W–83L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Susan Brunner
112W–99L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Conita Mullett
83W–94L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Christie Wyzykowski
59W–70L career · 8 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.