← Search

Trena Rairdon

Anchorage, AK
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 42W–30L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Trena Rairdon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
L
2025-12-11 · Making It Happen! · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janet Bidwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-12 · Full Metal Racket · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Curtis Nelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-02-02 · Full Metal Racket · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Hout mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-01-12 · Full Metal Racket · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lior Dolgonos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-6
W
2024-11-10 · Team 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lior Dolgonos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2024-11-09 · Team 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Leclair mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2024-09-15 · Team Kathryn · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathryn Hoke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2024-09-15 · Team Kathryn · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Denise Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
N/A
2024-09-08 · Team Kathryn · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Denise Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2024-09-08 · Team Kathryn · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Denise Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2024-06-22 · #2 Doubles · with Catherine Stone championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Catherine Stone championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
50%
10W–10L · 52.8% of games
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 63.4% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
70.8%
17W–7L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
3 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams