← Search

Jessie Lief

Anchorage, AK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
168 matches · 77W–91L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jessie Lief to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history168 matches
L
2026-07-17 · AK-TAC-Steller · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Cotton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-01 · AK-TAC-Steller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Cotton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-19 · Challengers · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-19 · Challengers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bridget Powers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-12 · Challengers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Struzenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-29 · Always Sunny · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eva Lief
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-22 · Always Sunny · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Meyeraan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-21 · Always Sunny · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Drought
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-08 · Always Sunny · #1 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Garrett Danner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-06 · Always Sunny · #1 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Garrett Danner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-11 · Always Sunny · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Meyeraan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-08 · Always Sunny · #1 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Garrett Danner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 59.1% of games
3.0
100%
7W–0L · 73.5% of games
3.5
73.9%
17W–6L · 63.8% of games
4.0
11.1%
2W–16L · 19.6% of games
6.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 56.6% of games
7.5
15.8%
3W–16L · 39.4% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 35.7% of games
6.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 67.6% of games
7.0mixed
37.1%
13W–22L · 47.1% of games
8.0mixed
48.3%
14W–15L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
37 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal