Search

Grayson Dempsey

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
79 matches · 40W–39L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.87
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
95%
stay 3.0
5%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.82. Lower than today’s 2.87 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
151 of 357
OR · 3.0
260 of 600

Grayson is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
MAC-Boehm
2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2026
MAC-Dempsey
2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women
2026
MAC-Dempsey
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women
2026
MAC-Dempsey
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women
2025
Dempsey-R
2025 One Doubles · 3.0 Women
2025
MAC-Dempsey(s)
2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Grayson has been a steady 3.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

2.53.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Grayson has gone from the 43rd to the 48th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
57.1%
36W–27L · 52.5% of games
6.0mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 42.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history79 matches
L
Janice Kuo / Kristina Baker
2026-06-13 · MAC-Dempsey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Abigail Cupper
0.015below expectation — took 38% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Xizhen Palmer / Jing Bennett
2026-06-12 · MAC-Dempsey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacquelyn Miller
+0.076better than expected — took 92% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-10 · MAC-Dempsey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel Young
0.001about as expected — took 63% of games against 61% expected
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
Erin Legg / Becca Perry
2026-05-09 · MAC-Dempsey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Hill
+0.013better than expected — took 58% of games against 51% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · MAC-Dempsey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elisa Wickstrom
0.044below expectation — took 20% of games against 45% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Greta Miracle / Joanna Asia Wagner
2026-04-19 · MAC-Dempsey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gretchen Sturm
0.035below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-03-21 · MAC-Dempsey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel Young
0.006about as expected — took 67% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-01 · MAC-Dempsey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel Young
+0.007better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-02-14 · MAC-Dempsey · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Abigail Cupper
+0.015better than expected — took 57% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-02-01 · MAC-Dempsey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gretchen Sturm
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Jane King Ayers / Jean Schnadig
2026-01-04 · MAC-Dempsey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Abigail Cupper
0.008below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2025-10-26 · MAC-Boehm · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jack Dempsey
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.