Search

Susie Lim

Portland, OR
3.0S year-end 2025
20 matches · 7W–13L · seasons 20252026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.61
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
8%
down to 2.5
92%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 5% down · 95% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.63. Higher than today’s 2.61 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
336 of 357
OR · 3.0
559 of 600

Susie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams8 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Susie has been a steady 3.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

2.53.020252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 34.9% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history20 matches
W
2026-07-25 · THPRD-Feng · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Jung
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-19 · THPRD-Feng · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Jung
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Brenda Elliott / Laya Motahari
2026-07-18 · Sunset Gals · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Wang
0.008about as expected — took 45% of games against 49% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · THPRD-Feng · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Jung
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Michelle Chow / Chloe Wu
2026-07-11 · Sunset Gals · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yan Li
+0.021better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Jennifer Andrieu / Robert Moremixed
2026-07-11 · THPRD-Feng · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Wickham
+0.000better than expected — took 44% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-08 · SAC-Smith/Wang · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Wang
0.036below expectation — took 33% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Kathryn Harlan / Brenda Hudson
2026-04-26 · SAC-Smith/Wang · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsay Freed
+0.003about as expected — took 46% of games against 45% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-18 · SAC-Smith/Wang · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meena Gunturu
0.014below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Deanna Williams / Erin Corzine
2026-03-29 · SAC-Smith/Wang · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsay Freed
0.014below expectation — took 32% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-03-07 · SAC-Andersen/Hummel · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pujitha Davuluri
0.006below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Grayson Dempsey / Rachel Young
2026-03-01 · SAC-Andersen/Hummel · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natasha Brady
0.007below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.