THPRD-Feng

2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.64 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82

Michael Jung

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.81

Mumukshu Patel

usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.70

Van Khieu

usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4

3.68

LINH HO

usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4

3.47

Tianjiao Chen

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.46

Sac Roth

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.27

Christine Wall

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.25

Jing Feng

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.18

Zachary Wright

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

2.61

Susie Lim

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3

2.60

Thu Johnson

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

Michael Jung

66W–37L career

0%99%1%

3.82

Mumukshu Patel

19W–13L career

1%97%2%

3.81

Van Khieu

99W–48L career

1%99%0%

3.70

LINH HO

27W–14L career

8%92%0%

3.68

3.5

Tianjiao Chen

16W–15L career

0%86%14%

3.47

3.5

Sac Roth

15W–12L career

0%86%14%

3.46

Christine Wall

81W–92L career

93%7%0%

3.27

3.5

Jing Feng

113W–80L career

1%99%0%

3.25

3.5

Zachary Wright

177W–141L career

3%97%0%

3.18

Susie Lim

7W–13L career · type S

10%90%0%

2.61

Thu Johnson

45W–25L career

14%86%0%

2.60

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.