CRRC-Jacobsen

2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.2 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64

Clare Belott

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5

3.50

Brad Johnson

usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5

3.33

Cory Heisterkamp

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5

3.16

Vanessa Weber

usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3

3.13

Garrett Bluemmel

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.12

Megan Mandel

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3

3.01

Chase Stowell

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.98

Alexander Abrazaldo

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3

2.89

Roxanna Johnson

usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.87

Margaret Jacobsen

usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5

Clare Belott

50W–20L career

0%41%59%

3.64

3.5

Brad Johnson

193W–102L career

0%83%17%

3.50

3.5

Cory Heisterkamp

86W–50L career

0%99%1%

3.33

Vanessa Weber

55W–35L career

0%35%65%

3.16

3.5

Garrett Bluemmel

18W–13L career

13%87%0%

3.13

Megan Mandel

37W–27L career

0%48%53%

3.12

Chase Stowell

32W–17L career

0%77%23%

3.01

Alexander Abrazaldo

24W–15L career

0%82%18%

2.98

Roxanna Johnson

114W–65L career

0%97%3%

2.89

Margaret Jacobsen

69W–50L career

0%98%2%

2.87

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.