Search

Anne Gaggini

Sherwood, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
43 matches · 29W–14L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.97
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
62%
stay 3.0
38%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 90% stay · 10% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.90. Lower than today’s 2.97 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Sherwood · 3.0
2 of 6
OR · 3.0
157 of 600

Anne is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Anne has been 3.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Anne has gone from the 49th to the 97th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 63.1% of games
3.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 57.8% of games
6.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 43.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history43 matches
W
Dave Ramm / Phyllis Shenmixed
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stefano Gaggini
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Van Chinh Bui / Mindy Chin
2026-07-16 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Marianne McIntosh
0.024below expectation — took 40% of games against 52% expected
6-4
W
Brittany Connelly / Dustin Eddymixed
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stefano Gaggini
+0.000better than expected — took 57% of games against 44% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marianne McIntosh
+0.027better than expected — took 52% of games against 42% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Molly Briscoe / Elisa Wickstrom
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Thomas
+0.030better than expected — took 72% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Thomas
0.009below expectation — took 50% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Malia Laport
+0.026better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Kitty Yan / Gail Abegg
2026-01-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susanne Cochran
+0.064better than expected — took 86% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Theresa Hagerty / Priscilla Connolly
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rhonda Baker
+0.067better than expected — took 92% of games against 55% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alex Jones
+0.010about as expected — took 33% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Jody Yates / Jann Purdy
2025-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Young
+0.034better than expected — took 92% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Joann Szueber / Erin Ince
2025-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marianne McIntosh
0.022below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.