← Search

Hiroko Ishikawa

Hillsboro, OR
2.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
24 matches · 8W–16L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Hiroko Ishikawa to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
L
2026-09-13 · SAC-Koeberl · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Ricardo Ascazubi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-01 · SAC-Koeberl · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Ricardo Ascazubi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-18 · SAC-Koeberl · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Patrick Koeberl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Michelle Hodges championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · SAC-Ferrell/Yates · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Hyun Jeong Min
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-06 · SAC-Ferrell/Yates · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Hyun Jeong Min
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · SAC-Ferrell/Yates · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lori Andersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-04-26 · SAC-Smith/Wang · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Farrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-19 · SAC-Ferrell/Yates · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kimberly Shaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-20 · SAC-Andersen/Hummel · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Farrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-15 · SAC-Farrell/Yates · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michelle Hodges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-07 · SAC-Andersen/Hummel · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsay Freed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
50%
4W–4L · 50% of games
3.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 34.1% of games
0.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 39.7% of games
2.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
4 matches
#1 Female Doubles
13%
3 matches
#1 Singles
8%
2 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova