Search

Tammy Russum

Beaverton, OR
3.0C year-end 2024
52 matches · 23W–29L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.73
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Beaverton · 3.0
33 of 47
OR · 3.0
457 of 600

Tammy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tammy has been 3.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

2.53.0202020212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Tammy has gone from the 14th to the 11th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
39.1%
9W–14L · 41.9% of games
6.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 58.2% of games
6.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 37.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history52 matches
W
Lindsay Freed / Hiroko Ishikawa
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Kaufman
+0.020better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Virginia Welch
0.036below expectation — took 37% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimbra Kasch
0.030below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
N/A
2025-11-23 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katherine Fisher
+0.084better than expected — took 100% of games against 54% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Caryn Leach / Simone Frank
2025-10-04 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Luz Zanavich
0.056below expectation — took 33% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2024-11-16 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kimbra Kasch
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-1, 6-3
L
2024-10-11 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kimbra Kasch
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-0, 6-2
L
2024-09-28 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Block
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 6-3
W
2024-05-11 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Prescott
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-05-05 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael McTague
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Kathi Hermanski / Christopher Hermanskimixed
2024-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Prescott
+0.000better than expected — took 92% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2024-04-20 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert Hesslink
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.