Teams

GLVR-Kasch

2024 Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.06 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Jennifer Pultz
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.87
Kimbra Kasch
published 3
2.85
David Prescott
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.81
Robert Hesslink
published 3
2.77
Lars Kasch
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.68
Jeremy Geschwind
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.60
Michael McTague
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.59
Paull Kaady
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Results10 ties
2024-05-11Won 30
W#1 DoublesLars Kasch / Kimbra Kasch vs Rodney Johnson / Denise Butchee6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichael McTague / Judy Friedman vs David-Richard Layzell / Kristin Vandehey7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDavid Prescott / Tammy Russum vs Kimberly Shaffer / Tom Hsu6-2, 6-2
2024-05-10Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJeremy Geschwind / Judy Friedman vs Tim Janes / Valerie Neill6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPaull Kaady / Dianna Kaady vs Steve Siegel / Rose Lee2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Prescott / Beth Gebstadt vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-05Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJeremy Geschwind / Judy Friedman vs Jennifer Bayless / Jeffrey Bayless6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMichael McTague / Tammy Russum vs David Graham / Susan Sienko6-3, 6-2
2024-04-26Won 30
W#1 DoublesKimbra Kasch / Lars Kasch vs Tracey Beagle / Monte Gonzales6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Pultz / Paull Kaady vs Bess Jacobo / ROSS GREEN6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTammy Russum / David Prescott vs Kathi Hermanski / Christopher Hermanski6-1, 6-0
2024-04-20Split 11
L#1 DoublesJeremy Geschwind / Judy Friedman vs Matt Savage / Robin Burak6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPaull Kaady / Dianna Kaady vs Patrick Rhea / Tamara Phillips4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-12Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Pultz / David Prescott vs Megan Ullmann / Bryan Potter6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBeth Gebstadt / Jeremy Geschwind vs Deborah Cohen / Dave Brown3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDianna Kaady / Paull Kaady vs Denise Townsend / Paul Ecker6-4, 6-4
2024-04-06Won 20
W#2 DoublesJudy Friedman / Michael McTague vs Angela Keating / Jeffrey Kaye6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Block / Lars Kasch vs Kristi Tompkins / Feng-Yu Liu6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-03-23Split 11
W#1 DoublesJeremy Geschwind / Jennifer Pultz vs Scott Quinn / Cynthia Ross-Brockett7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLars Kasch / Kimbra Kasch vs James Lawrence / Raquel Rich6-4, 6-3
2024-03-22Won 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Pultz / Michael McTague vs Tara Morissette / Jonathan Guinn6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDianna Kaady / Paull Kaady vs CHRISTINE McNair / Matt McNair6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesBeth Gebstadt / David Prescott vs Kyle McAvoy / Robert Burlingame6-1, 7-5
2024-03-15Split 11
L#1 DoublesKimbra Kasch / Lars Kasch vs Cricket Forsey / Doug Denney6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJennifer Pultz / Michael McTague vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jennifer Pultz
112W–67L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3
Kimbra Kasch
40W–45L career
0%97%3%
2.87
3
David Prescott
44W–47L career
1%91%8%
2.85
3
Robert Hesslink
70W–52L career
0%98%2%
2.81
3
Lars Kasch
32W–61L career
2%96%2%
2.77
3
Jeremy Geschwind
33W–57L career
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Michael McTague
50W–87L career
18%82%0%
2.60
3
Paull Kaady
5W–12L career · type S
20%80%0%
2.59

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.