← Search

Sarah Chung

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 5W–18L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history23 matches
L
2024-05-07 · IRV-Vickers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Baker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-05-02 · IRV-Vickers · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Baker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-03-14 · IRV-Vickers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sherry Williamson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
Dinah Adkins / Barbara Schultz
2023-08-22 · IRV-Vickers/Scotten · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Carol Chadwick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2023-06-29 · IRV-Vickers/Scotten · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Mary Mountain
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-06-22 · IRV-Vickers/Scotten · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Shelley Stoffer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
W
2023-05-04 · IRV-Vickers · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Stevenson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2023-04-27 · IRV-Vickers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laney Kibel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2023-04-13 · IRV-Vickers · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Knocke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2023-04-04 · IRV-Vickers · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Stevenson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2022-04-18 · IRV-Vickers · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Knocke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2022-04-13 · IRV-Vickers · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sherry Williamson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
0.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
25%
5W–15L · 39.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe