← Search

Mary Baker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
9 matches · 4W–5L · seasons 2022–2024
Match history9 matches
W
2024-05-09 · IRV-Vickers · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Vickers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 7-5
L
2024-05-07 · IRV-Vickers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sarah Chung
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-05-02 · IRV-Vickers · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sarah Chung
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-04-25 · IRV-Vickers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Vickers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-04-04 · IRV-Vickers · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Vickers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-03-14 · IRV-Vickers · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janice Harvey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-03-24 · IRV-Vickers · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Stevenson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-1
W
2022-03-31 · IRV-Vickers · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Knocke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
L
2022-03-25 · IRV-Vickers · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sarah Chung
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2022–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
6.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 78% of the time
#1 Doubles
78%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe