← Teams

IRV-Duval/Quisling

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Heather Selis
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Michelle Boucher
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.79
Ashley Bevan
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.64
Kelly Letourneau
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
Results19 ties
2025-08-23Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesSarie Crothers / Michelle Boucher vs Liz VanDerschelden / Debbie Donovan6-1, 7-6
2025-08-22Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesHeather Selis / Deborah Cohen vs Andrea Jedel / Rose Longoria6-4, 1-1
2025-06-22Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesMichelle Boucher / Tracy Laidley vs Sharon Abegg / Hyo Han6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDeborah Cohen / Heather Selis vs Suzana Bulatovic / Cindy Stoneback6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-06-22Won 1–0
W#2 SinglesKelly Letourneau vs Colleen Atherton7-5, 6-4
2025-06-21Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesMichelle Boucher / Lucia Parker vs Amanda Ortiz / Colleen Tracy6-3, 6-3
2025-06-20Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesMichelle Boucher / Brooke Kuerbis vs Barbara van Sickle / Kathy Shouse6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDeborah Cohen / Heather Selis vs Teresa Conover / MaryAnn Baker6-2, 6-2
2025-06-20Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesAshley Bevan / Lucia Parker vs Sandee Andrews / Voni Tombari6-3, 6-4
2025-06-14Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesHeather Selis / Ashley Bevan vs Erin Ince / Christina Parks6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesKelly Letourneau vs Shannon Lucas6-2, 6-2
2025-06-07Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMinda Garvens / Ashley Bevan vs Joann Szueber / Samantha Damiano6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKathy Cooke / Michelle Boucher vs Chana Dolbey / Alisa Rakoz6-3, 6-3
2025-05-31Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesAshley Bevan / Eryn Hoerster vs Molly Hisatomi / Erin Dineen7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMinda Garvens / Kelly Letourneau vs Barbra Jorgensen / Elisa Wickstrom7-5, 6-2
2025-05-10Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesAshley Bevan / Michelle Boucher vs Sara Hudspeth / Sidney Clarke6-1, 6-3
2025-05-04Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesHeather Selis / Kate Quisling vs Sarah Felker / Robin Browne6-4, 6-2
2025-04-12Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesKate Quisling / Heather Selis vs Dawan Pandya / Misug Kim6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMinda Garvens / Ashley Bevan vs Heather Dale / Jennifer Thompson6-3, 7-5
2025-04-05Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesAshley Bevan / Eryn Hoerster vs Jane Shu / Li Tang6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKelly Letourneau / Kristin DuVal vs Evelyne Cassell / Jennifer Tobin6-3, 6-3
2025-03-23Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesDeborah Cohen / Heather Selis vs Kara Petracca / Amy Pickens6-1, 6-0
2025-03-22Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesAmy Marr / Heather Selis vs Lara Lunsford / Crystal Ounaphom4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-21Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Boucher / Lucia Parker vs Chana Dolbey / Alisa Rakoz6-1, 6-4
2024-12-08Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesDeborah Cohen / Heather Selis vs Carmen Warda / Lisa McBee6-3, 7-5
2024-12-07Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesAshley Bevan / Tracy Laidley vs Megan Clifford / Priscilla Connolly6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Heather Selis
35W–60L career
0%84%16%
2.97
3
Michelle Boucher
45W–40L career
1%93%6%
2.85
3
Ashley Bevan
36W–28L career
1%98%1%
2.79
3
Kelly Letourneau
15W–19L career
10%89%0%
2.64

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.