← Search

Elizabeth Lilly

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
54 matches · 27W–27L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.70
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.0
130 of 266
OR · 4.0
241 of 498

Elizabeth is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Elizabeth has been 4.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.020192022202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Elizabeth has gone from the 11th to the 47th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
48.8%
20W–21L · 47.5% of games
8.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history54 matches
W
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Lovett
+0.058better than expected — took 63% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deana Julka
−0.031below expectation — took 28% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alyssa Wong
−0.006about as expected — took 65% of games against 64% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jean Herbst
−0.041below expectation — took 29% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Luthi
+0.015about as expected — took 37% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Stevens
+0.010about as expected — took 47% of games against 42% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Luthi
+0.023better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-01-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jean Herbst
+0.004about as expected — took 63% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki Metcalf
−0.005about as expected — took 54% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jean Herbst
+0.041better than expected — took 53% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Meagher
+0.010better than expected — took 65% of games against 58% expected
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2025-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Lovett
+0.020about as expected — took 37% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.