← Search

Kim Stevens

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 56W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kim Stevens to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
L
2026-03-01 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Go
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-02-14 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Lilly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-24 · THPRD-Feng 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Wang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-10 · THPRD-Feng 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Shen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-04-06 · THPRD-Feng 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Sun mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-04-03 · WHRC-Kobin/Witcosky · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tamara Witcosky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-28 · THPRD-Feng 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Shen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-03-01 · MAC-Pickard/Lovett · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Go
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-02-22 · MAC-Pickard/Lovett · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Lilly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-02-16 · MAC-Pickard/Lovett · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elisa Landers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2024-11-16 · MAC-Leedy/Davis · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dory Simons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-11-08 · MAC-Go/Lovett · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Catherine Go
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams86 teams · 2006–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
60%
18W–12L · 55.5% of games
7.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.1% of games
8.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 49.3% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
51.4%
19W–18L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
28 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe