Search

Kim Stevens

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
100 matches · 56W–44L · seasons 20192026
Where Kim sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Kim is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams86 teams · 2006–2026
MAC-Lovett/Pickard
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women
2026
N OR-THPRD-Hockman
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2026
MAC-Brown/Kim
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women
2026
Simons Bliss
2025 One Doubles · 4.0 Women
2025
MAC-Pickard/Lovett
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women
2025
MAC-Leedy/Davis
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kim has been 4.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.02019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Kim has gone from the 73rd to the 86th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
60%
18W–12L · 55.5% of games
7.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.1% of games
8.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 49.3% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
51.4%
19W–18L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history100 matches
L
2026-03-01 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Go
0.022below expectation — took 38% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-02-14 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Lilly
+0.010about as expected — took 47% of games against 42% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-05-24 · THPRD-Feng 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Wang
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-10 · THPRD-Feng 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Shen
+0.000better than expected — took 52% of games against 37% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-04-06 · THPRD-Feng 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Sun
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-04-03 · WHRC-Kobin/Witcosky · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tamara Witcosky
+0.026better than expected — took 37% of games against 31% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-03-28 · THPRD-Feng 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Shen
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-03-01 · MAC-Pickard/Lovett · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Go
+0.027better than expected — took 86% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-02-22 · MAC-Pickard/Lovett · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Lilly
0.028below expectation — took 8% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-02-16 · MAC-Pickard/Lovett · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elisa Landers
0.040below expectation — took 48% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2024-11-16 · MAC-Leedy/Davis · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dory Simons
+0.026better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-11-08 · MAC-Go/Lovett · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Catherine Go
+0.004about as expected — took 38% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.