Search

Sheila McCarroll

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
46 matches · 20W–26L · seasons 20192025
Where Sheila sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Sheila is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sheila has been a steady 3.5 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Sheila has gone from the 88th to the 85th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
75%
12W–4L · 62.3% of games
4.0
0%
0W–8L · 38.9% of games
7.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.5% of games
8.0
20%
2W–8L · 40.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history46 matches
L
2024-12-06 · #1 Doubles · with Crystal Miller
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-11-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Crystal Miller
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-11-16 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kaoru Nelson
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-10-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hideko Kershaw
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 3-3
W
2024-05-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Blebea
+0.016better than expected — took 67% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Vicino
0.018below expectation — took 38% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
2024-05-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lilian Ezaki de Araujo
+0.022better than expected — took 63% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2024-03-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Vicino
+0.010better than expected — took 75% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-01-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Vicino
+0.004about as expected — took 65% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2023-11-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margaret Sivertsen
0.048below expectation — took 48% of games against 67% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2023-11-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Crystal Miller
0.001about as expected — took 62% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Sammie Sue Willenborg / Karen Groenweghe
2023-10-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Arnheim
0.011about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.