Search

Hideko Kershaw

Beaverton, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
105 matches · 37W–68L · seasons 20192025
Where Hideko sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Hideko is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Hideko has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 8.0, Hideko has gone from the 63rd to the 16th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
24.1%
7W–22L · 43.6% of games
7.0
52.4%
11W–10L · 50.4% of games
8.0
34.6%
9W–17L · 43.6% of games
7.0mixed
30.4%
7W–16L · 45.3% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history105 matches
L
2025-03-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ellen Bowman
+0.014better than expected — took 50% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Hockman
0.003below expectation — took 25% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-01-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Hockman
0.013below expectation — took 38% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2024-11-22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandi Martes
0.052below expectation — took 8% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2024-11-16 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Hanson
+0.014about as expected — took 37% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-11-10 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Hanson
+0.022better than expected — took 46% of games against 38% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2024-10-26 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joanetta Testa
0.030below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Kelly Asbridge / Sandra Seyler
2024-10-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Crystal Miller
+0.035better than expected — took 67% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-10-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheila McCarroll
0.002about as expected — took 56% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 3-3
W
N/A
2024-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandi Martes
0.019better than expected — took 100% of games against 90% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-10-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jackie Konen
0.072below expectation — took 47% of games against 69% expected
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2024-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Boss
+0.017better than expected — took 44% of games against 38% expected
7-6, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.