← Teams

MAC-Leedy/Davis

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.54 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Kim Stevens
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.44
Dory Simons
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Janae Pyle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Julie Kim
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
—
Wendy Whitsell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Jill Eilers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Hanny Tan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Alison Davis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.05
Laura Laney
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Catherine Leedy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Gretchen Wagner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.91
Nancy Williams
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.89
Barbara Gram
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-11-23Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMarcy Bernhardt / Hanny Tan vs Vera Vos / Kathleen Budnick6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Kim / Kim Wright vs Laurence Dupray / Christine Moran6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLaura Laney / Nancy Williams vs Mary Head / Charleen Straub7-6, 6-0
2024-11-16Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesDory Simons / Kim Stevens vs Sheila McCarroll / Kaoru Nelson6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarcy Bernhardt / Hanny Tan vs Crystal Miller / Andrea Vicino7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJulia Hall / Janae Pyle vs Cynthia Ross-Brockett / Margaret Sivertsen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-11-02Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMarcy Bernhardt / Jill Eilers vs Nenette Olson / Robin Burak7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlison Davis / Julia Hall vs Vicki Blunt / Bernice Zhang7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBarbara Gram / Kim Stevens vs Rita Arden / Gena Martinez6-4, 6-4
2024-10-26Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJanae Pyle / Nancy Williams vs Kathy Ramsey / Paula Conway6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesGretchen Wagner / Wendy Whitsell vs Linda Castaneda / Catherine Greenblatt6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDory Simons / Barbara Gram vs Kim Hevia / Laura Shier6-4, 6-4
2024-10-19Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Janae Pyle vs Tara Delarosa / Sheila Schmidt6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKim Stevens / Wendy Whitsell vs Susan Eldridge / Judith Kobin6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Bachhuber / Laura Laney vs Sadhana Kapur / Kathy Ottesen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-12Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJulie Kim / Hanny Tan vs Kim Tellin / Jian Xu6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Laney / Carolyn Bachhuber vs Ellen Hodges / Betty Roux0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGretchen Wagner / Deb Garris vs Jill Boyce / Catherine Huang7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2024-10-04Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesBarbara Gram / Julie Kim vs Timothea Barnatan / Laura Rundle7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDory Simons / Kim Wright vs Jill Boyce / Kim Tellin6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlison Davis / Julia Hall vs Ellen Hodges / Betty Roux7-5, 6-3
2024-09-22Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Bachhuber / Catherine Leedy vs Kathleen Budnick / Vera Vos6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDeb Garris / Dory Simons vs Laurence Dupray / Ella Grant6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJill Eilers / Nancy Williams vs Devrie Brennan / Jana Hirst6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Kim Stevens
56W–44L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Dory Simons
65W–31L career
0%91%9%
3.44
3.5
Janae Pyle
98W–49L career
0%95%5%
3.39
4
Julie Kim
49W–37L career · type A
61%39%0%
3.39
3.5
Wendy Whitsell
33W–25L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Jill Eilers
34W–18L career
2%97%0%
3.23
3.5
Hanny Tan
44W–24L career
7%93%0%
3.18
3.5
Alison Davis
80W–62L career
27%73%1%
3.08
3.5
Laura Laney
59W–48L career
22%78%0%
3.05
3.5
Catherine Leedy
86W–119L career
23%77%0%
3.04
3.5
Gretchen Wagner
40W–54L career
35%65%0%
3.00
3.5
Nancy Williams
59W–52L career
59%41%0%
2.91
3
Barbara Gram
127W–129L career
0%97%3%
2.89

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.