← Teams

WHRC-Kobin/Witcosky

2025 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Claire Thayer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.76
Yumiko Pike
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
—
Kim Stevens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Sharon Grilley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Jan Rothert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Judith Kobin
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Becky Rey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.46
Deborah Borchers
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Results8 ties
2025-05-16Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesTeresa Neal / Deborah Borchers vs Tami Oglesby / Carol Chiu6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKimberly Cunningham / Sharon Grilley vs Liz DelPlato / Marie Picard6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesBecky Rey / Yumiko Pike vs Linda Lovett / Katherine Kralj7-6, 7-5
2025-05-09Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesBecky Rey / Yumiko Pike vs Liz DelPlato / Marie Picard6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKimberly Cunningham / Sharon Grilley vs Linda Lovett / Tami Oglesby6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJudith Kobin / Claire Thayer vs Lee Havens / Donna Roisom6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-05-01Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJudith Kobin / Mary Anderson vs Terri Pickard / Susan Suttich7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKimberly Cunningham / Sharon Grilley vs Kathleen Schlickeiser / Grace Browning6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBecky Rey / Deborah Borchers vs Julia Karlin / Nancy Atkins6-2, 7-5
2025-04-11Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesTeresa Neal / Deborah Borchers vs Donna Roisom / Lee Havens5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarol Briggs / Jan Rothert vs Elda Nelson / Linda Lovett3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJudith Kobin / Claire Thayer vs Katherine Kralj / Kathleen Goodfriend7-6, 6-2
2025-04-08Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJudith Kobin / Mary Anderson vs Nancy Atkins / Terri Pickard6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTeresa Neal / Claire Thayer vs Marcia Baisch / Grace Browning6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJan Rothert / Tamara Witcosky vs Susan Suttich / Mary Sides4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-04-03Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesYumiko Pike / Deborah Borchers vs Donna Roisom / Kathleen Goodfriend7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKim Stevens / Tamara Witcosky vs Linda Lovett / Katherine Kralj6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJudith Kobin / Mary Anderson vs Penny Birkhofer / Marie Picard6-2, 6-4
2025-03-25Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesJan Rothert / Carol Briggs vs Mary Head / Charleen Straub6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesClaire Thayer / Judith Kobin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-20Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesJudith Kobin / Becky Rey vs Susan Suttich / Carla Wheeler6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarol Briggs / Jan Rothert vs Mary Head / Charleen Straub6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Claire Thayer
136W–67L career
0%98%2%
3.84
4
Yumiko Pike
73W–97L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Kim Stevens
56W–44L career
not enough data
—
4
Sharon Grilley
37W–33L career
4%95%1%
3.73
4
Jan Rothert
39W–28L career
8%91%1%
3.70
4
Judith Kobin
90W–95L career
34%66%0%
3.50
4
Becky Rey
26W–49L career
43%57%0%
3.47
4
Deborah Borchers
53W–101L career
46%54%0%
3.46

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.