← Teams

MAC-Herbst

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.93 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Darci Keljo
published 4
—
Susie Jansky
published 4
3.67
Linda Lovett
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.61
Geraldine Carter
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Catherine Go
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.48
Jeanette Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.40
Katie Jurgenson
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Results14 ties
2025-09-13Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesLinda Lovett / Tami Oglesby vs Roann Milligan / Ludy Kellett6-0, 7-6
2025-09-12Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesLinda Lovett / Elda Nelson vs Sheryl Fewkes / Ginger Alden2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-09-11Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesLinda Lovett / Elda Nelson vs Joanne Jacoby / Kathy Govier7-6, 7-5
2025-06-21Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesLinda Lovett / Catherine Go vs Cheri Martes Davis / Krissi Martes7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGeraldine Carter / Elisa Landers vs Sharon Kim-Geib / Alexis Pond6-1, 6-1
2025-06-21Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesJeanette Thomas / Jean Zuber Marshburn vs Karen Abbott / Claudia Shanley6-3, 6-3
2025-06-20Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesJeanette Thomas / Jean Zuber Marshburn vs Evangeline Laurie / Radona Peterson6-2, 6-2
2025-06-06Lost 1–2
L#2 DoublesLinda Lovett / Geraldine Carter vs Morgan Towle / Kristen Kopack7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesKatie Jurgenson vs Stella Kayser6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAlyssa Wong / Jeanette Thomas vs Lisa Lyon / Cathy Porter3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-31Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMegan Meagher / Linda Lovett vs Holly Kanz / Danielle Cuenco6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKatie Jurgenson vs Morgan Cowling6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJeanette Thomas / Alyssa Wong vs Melissa Light / Nina Hanson6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-25Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJeanette Thomas / Alyssa Wong vs Tami McAra / Crystal Bryant2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKatie Jurgenson vs Jennifer Petersen4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-05-03Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesCatherine Go / Nikki Metcalf vs Kristie Leake / Kristin Spear6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLinda Lovett / Elizabeth Lilly vs Teresa Sullivan / Valyrie Ingram6-4, 6-3
2025-04-27Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesLinda Lovett / Catherine Go vs Michelle Beilstein / Karen Ohollaren6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Lilly / Jeanette Thomas vs Allison Schenk / Donna Feuerherdt6-1, 6-1
2025-04-13Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesCatherine Go / Geraldine Carter vs Mary Chennault / Theresa Mallari6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesKatie Jurgenson vs Amanda Wagner6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJeanette Thomas / Nikki Metcalf vs Heather Watkins / Puntrigar Suriyaseang3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-06Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesLinda Lovett / Loann Wong vs Kristie Leake / Kristin Spear6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAlyssa Wong / Jeanette Thomas vs Teresa Sullivan / Valyrie Ingram6-2, 6-0
L#2 SinglesKatie Jurgenson vs Bo Yu6-0, 7-5
2024-12-07Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesJeanette Thomas / Jean Zuber Marshburn vs Ann Kitchen / Inge Marshall6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Darci Keljo
55W–36L career
0%97%3%
3.87
4
Susie Jansky
53W–45L career
not enough data
—
4
Linda Lovett
93W–105L career
4%96%0%
3.67
4
Geraldine Carter
29W–28L career
20%80%1%
3.61
4
Catherine Go
87W–77L career
18%82%0%
3.58
4
Jeanette Thomas
89W–74L career
40%60%0%
3.48
3.5
Katie Jurgenson
84W–60L career
0%95%5%
3.40

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.