Teams

VTC-Watkins/Chennault

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.95 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Carrie Willis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.81
Shiori Baba
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.77
Mary Chennault
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.77
Jenica Susi
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.64
Jennifer Andrieu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.62
Nikki Nadig
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.61
Sammy Bui
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.60
Theresa Mallari
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Heather Watkins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.53
Katrina Phillips
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.33
Puntrigar Suriyaseang
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Carrie Willis
121W–52L career
0%97%3%
3.86
4
Shiori Baba
12W–14L career
1%96%3%
3.81
4
Mary Chennault
106W–57L career
1%98%1%
3.77
4
Jenica Susi
74W–34L career
0%99%0%
3.77
4
Jennifer Andrieu
52W–77L career
5%95%0%
3.64
4
Nikki Nadig
71W–60L career
12%88%0%
3.62
4
Sammy Bui
81W–66L career
10%90%0%
3.61
4
Theresa Mallari
60W–57L career
12%88%0%
3.60
4
Heather Watkins
118W–96L career
14%86%0%
3.58
4
Katrina Phillips
35W–40L career · type A
26%74%0%
3.53
3.5
Puntrigar Suriyaseang
33W–49L career
0%99%1%
3.33

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.