← Teams

GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist

2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.94 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Angie Stromquist
published 4
3.74
Colleen Nolan
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.72
Christy Strange
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.70
Mary Klinger
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Tomoko Iwata
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.58
Tina Farrelly
published 4
3.56
Gabriela McIntosh
published 4
3.54
Leah Buxman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.47
Kana Wakamatsu
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Results11 ties
2025-09-13Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesTomoko Iwata / Sharon Mathew vs Rene Noeun / Kylea Gleason6-4, 7-6
2025-09-12Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesTomoko Iwata / Jamie Slonaker vs Allison Erickson / Catherine Stone6-0, 6-3
2025-08-17Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesSharon Mathew / Tomoko Iwata vs Allison Fryman / Megan Soucy6-2, 7-6
2025-03-16Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesLeah Buxman / Christy Strange vs Courtney Pierce / Geraldine Carter6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMary Klinger vs Elisa Landers6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesColleen Nolan / Cindy del Rosario vs Linda Lovett / Jean Herbst6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-03-02Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesChristy Strange / Mary Klinger vs Sammy Bui / Kristin Szumlas7-6, 7-5
L#1 SinglesColleen Nolan vs Carrie Willis6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCourtney Storrs / Kana Wakamatsu vs Mary Chennault / Nikki Nadig6-2, 7-6
2025-02-23Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesLeah Buxman / Sara van Beckum vs Deborah Borchers / Mari Mitchelson7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesColleen Nolan vs Janet Mills6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChristy Strange / Courtney Storrs vs Nenette Olson / Lucia von Flotow5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKana Wakamatsu / Gabriela McIntosh vs Karen Pickering / Vicki Blunt6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-02-15Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesColleen Nolan / Tina Farrelly vs Michele Heinrichson / Mckenna Selbak6-4, 6-3
2025-02-08Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesKacie Wise / Mary Klinger vs Keely Kopetz / JENNIFER BELOY7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesColleen Nolan vs Leslie Jones6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-01-25Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesMary Klinger / Kacie Wise vs Valyrie Ingram / Teresa Sullivan6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesColleen Nolan vs Molly Shum6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLeah Buxman / Sara van Beckum vs Helen Chen / Shannon Chen7-5, 7-5
2025-01-19Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesMary Klinger / Kana Wakamatsu vs Julie Hanson / Ellen Bowman6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesColleen Nolan vs Michelle Johnson6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChristy Strange / Courtney Storrs vs Alexis Pond / Cheryl Roloff6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCindy del Rosario / Tomoko Iwata vs Suzanne Boss / Sharon Kim-Geib6-2, 6-3
2025-01-04Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesLeah Buxman / Christy Strange vs Leigh Anderson / Kristen Fisher6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMary Klinger / Angie Stromquist vs Kris Kelly-Koster / Suzie Glenn3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Angie Stromquist
92W–47L career
1%98%0%
3.75
4
Colleen Nolan
177W–79L career
1%99%0%
3.74
4
Christy Strange
89W–67L career
1%98%0%
3.72
4
Mary Klinger
221W–142L career
2%98%0%
3.70
3.5
Tomoko Iwata
26W–11L career
0%37%63%
3.66
4
Tina Farrelly
115W–45L career
14%86%0%
3.58
4
Gabriela McIntosh
111W–90L career
18%82%0%
3.56
4
Leah Buxman
113W–106L career
23%77%0%
3.54
4
Kana Wakamatsu
60W–63L career
42%58%0%
3.47

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.