← Search

Elizabeth Domagalski

Lake Oswego, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 72W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Domagalski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Jessica Khalili championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-23 · NOR-MPRC-Huynh · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sherri Sacconaghi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-04-25 · NOR-MPRC-Huynh · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Fisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · with Carrie Fisher championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-27 · NOR-MPRC-Huynh · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Khalili
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-02-21 · N OR-MPRC-Huynh · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Khalili
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-02-14 · N OR-MPRC-Huynh · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Khalili
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-01-17 · N OR-MPRC-Huynh · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Khalili
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-15 · WHRC-Grilley/Adcock · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kana Wakamatsu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-10-25 · WHRC-Grilley/Adcock · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donna Roisom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-19 · WHRC-Grilley/Adcock · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kana Wakamatsu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-09-27 · WHRC-Grilley/Adcock · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bonnie Briggs-Ramm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2013–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
84%
21W–4L · 63.9% of games
4.0
61.5%
24W–15L · 54.3% of games
8.0
50%
5W–5L · 55.1% of games
7.0mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 38.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
24 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams