← Search

Chuck Gooding

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 27W–14L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Chuck Gooding to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
W
2026-04-18 · MPRC-Avenoso · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregg Palmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-17 · NOR-MPRC-Dudley · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lynn Sosa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · with David Kabaker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-05 · NOR-MPRC-Dudley · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heather Dudley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-14 · N OR-MPRC-Avenoso · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Avenoso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-02-21 · N OR-MPRC-Avenoso · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ken Avenoso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-01-02 · N OR-MPRC-Avenoso · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Hoiland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-11-16 · MPRC-Avenoso/Abel · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ken Avenoso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-07 · MPRC-Avenoso/Abel · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donald Pettitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with David Hoiland championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-06-08 · MPRC-Avenoso · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Hoiland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-24 · MPRC-Avenoso · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Broad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
77.8%
21W–6L · 62.8% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
60%
3W–2L · 47.4% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova