← Search

Michael Gibbons

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Portland, OR
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
16 matches · 3W–13L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history16 matches
L
2026-03-20 · WHRC-Becker/Melhorn · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Kitchen
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-29 · WHRC-Mo · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Thayer
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-09 · WHRC-Mo · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stanley Mo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-07 · WHRC-Mo · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stanley Mo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-01 · WHRC-Mo · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Becker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-26 · WHRC-Mo · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stanley Mo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-10-19 · WHRC-Mo · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Ritchie
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-09-29 · WHRC-Mo · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Stutzman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-09-07 · WHRC-Mo · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Jennings
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-08-15 · WHRC-Becker · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with John Kraxberger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
W
2024-07-12 · WHRC-Becker · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with James Horen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-06-05 · WHRC-Becker · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Randall Sinn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
8.3%
1W–11L · 23.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer