← Search

Todd Eckelman

Happy Valley, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
69 matches · 33W–36L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Todd Eckelman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history69 matches
L
2025-11-14 · MAC-Hill · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Thoman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-01 · MAC-Hill · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Thoman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-10-31 · MAC-Hill · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Barg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-26 · MAC-Hill · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-09-28 · MAC-Hill · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Finnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-09-07 · MAC-Hill · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Thoman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-03-08 · MAC-Armstrong/Thoman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-02-08 · MAC-Armstrong/Thoman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Santana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-02-01 · MAC-Armstrong/Thoman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-01-12 · MAC-Armstrong/Thoman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-12-08 · MAC-Turnbull/Hergenhan · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Herbst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2024-10-05 · MAC-Turnbull/Hergenhan · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Herbst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2001–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
45.2%
19W–23L · 49.5% of games
8.0
58.3%
14W–10L · 54.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
21 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal