← Search

Patrick Herbst

Lake Oswego, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 44W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Patrick Herbst to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
L
2026-03-21 · MAC-Kafi/Post · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-24 · MAC-Kafi/Post · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Torch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-11-22 · MAC-Turnbull/McDonagh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Helmer III
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-15 · MAC-Turnbull/McDonagh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Torch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-10-31 · MAC-Turnbull/McDonagh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Torch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-19 · MAC-Turnbull/McDonagh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Harry Semler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2025-02-16 · MAC-Kafi/Post · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyler Forrest
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-01-05 · MAC-Kafi/Post · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Torch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2024-12-08 · MAC-Turnbull/Hergenhan · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Todd Eckelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2024-11-17 · MAC-Turnbull/Hergenhan · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Hergenhan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2024-11-10 · MAC-Turnbull/Hergenhan · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donald Brenneman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2024-11-03 · MAC-Turnbull/Hergenhan · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Posewitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2012–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
60.4%
29W–19L · 54.3% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 53.3% of games
8.0mixed
25%
4W–12L · 39.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams