Search

David Hill

BEAVERTON, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
86 matches · 48W–38L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.60
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
11%
down to 3.5
89%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 7% down · 93% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.62. Higher than today’s 3.60 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
BEAVERTON · 4.0
6 of 6
OR · 4.0
376 of 498

David is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams39 teams · 2010–2027
MAC-Turnbull/McDonagh
2027 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men
2027
MAC-Kafi/Post
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
2026
MAC-Hill
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men
2026
MAC-Turnbull/Hergenhan
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men
2025
MAC-Armstrong/Thoman
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
2025
MAC-Henderson
2024 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

David has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 8.0, David has gone from the 19th to the 42nd percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
80%
16W–4L · 66.5% of games
4.0
34.6%
9W–17L · 43.9% of games
7.0
100%
5W–0L · 68.1% of games
8.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 45.4% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 58.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history86 matches
L
2026-03-21 · MAC-Kafi/Post · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Herbst
0.036below expectation — took 37% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Joey Lin / William Wang
2026-03-01 · MAC-Kafi/Post · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Armstrong
+0.009better than expected — took 53% of games against 47% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Neil Soiffer / Deepak Kumar
2025-11-22 · MAC-Hill · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ben Jacobson
0.021below expectation — took 45% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-14 · MAC-Hill · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Barg
0.014about as expected — took 50% of games against 55% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
John Helmer III / Christopher Graham
2025-10-31 · MAC-Hill · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Campbell
+0.018better than expected — took 60% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-10-18 · MAC-Hill · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ben Jacobson
+0.006about as expected — took 46% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-10-12 · MAC-Hill · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kit Johnson
+0.015better than expected — took 46% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
2025-09-07 · MAC-Hill · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ben Jacobson
+0.028better than expected — took 63% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-03-16 · MAC-Armstrong/Thoman · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kit Johnson
0.015below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-02-15 · MAC-Armstrong/Thoman · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.019below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-02-01 · MAC-Armstrong/Thoman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Thoman
+0.057better than expected — took 73% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 5-2
W
2025-01-05 · MAC-Armstrong/Thoman · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Henderson
+0.043better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.