Search

Jonathan Barg

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
67 matches · 24W–43L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.54
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
31%
down to 3.5
69%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 18% down · 82% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.57. Higher than today’s 3.54 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.0
232 of 266
OR · 4.0
430 of 498

Jonathan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams38 teams · 2009–2026
NOR-MAC-Henderson
2026 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Men
2026
MAC-Hill
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men
2026
MAC-Armstrong/Thoman
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men
2025
N OR-MAC-Henderson
2025 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Men
2025
MAC-Henderson
2024 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men
2024
MAC-Johnson/Luong
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jonathan has been a steady 4.0 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.54.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jonathan has gone from the 68th to the 18th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
32.4%
11W–23L · 44.7% of games
8.0
38.5%
10W–16L · 48.6% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history67 matches
L
2026-04-23 · NOR-MAC-Henderson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Krum
0.015about as expected — took 52% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-22 · MAC-Hill · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donald Brenneman
0.021below expectation — took 60% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-11-14 · MAC-Hill · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Hill
0.014about as expected — took 50% of games against 55% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-31 · MAC-Hill · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Todd Eckelman
0.019below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-10-26 · MAC-Hill · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donald Brenneman
+0.008about as expected — took 44% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
2025-10-12 · MAC-Hill · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donald Brenneman
0.001about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-28 · MAC-Hill · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Campbell
+0.005about as expected — took 45% of games against 43% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-04-18 · N OR-MAC-Henderson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Stromme
+0.004about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-20 · N OR-MAC-Henderson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Popplewell
0.030below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-03-01 · MAC-Armstrong/Thoman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Henderson
0.000about as expected — took 43% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-01-05 · MAC-Armstrong/Thoman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kit Johnson
+0.009about as expected — took 33% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-06-16 · MAC-Johnson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Hill
+0.049better than expected — took 75% of games against 49% expected
6-0, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.