← Search

John Christiaan

Gresham, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 53W–49L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add John Christiaan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history102 matches
W
2026-09-12 · CAC-Morales/Olson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Luangrath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-06-21 · CAC-Lewis/Christiaan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Eliason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-10 · CAC-Lewis/Christiaan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Eliason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2025-04-27 · CAC-Lewis/Christiaan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grant Grainger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-04-13 · CAC-Lewis/Christiaan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-04-05 · CAC-Lewis/Christiaan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-03-30 · CAC-Lewis/Christiaan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-03-15 · CAC-Ferek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tony Khamsouk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-08 · CAC-Ferek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tim Luangrath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-03-01 · CAC-Ferek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Eliason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-02-01 · CAC-Ferek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cuong Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-01-11 · CAC-Ferek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2007–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
57.1%
40W–30L · 52.6% of games
8.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 47.1% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
19 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe