← Search

Mark Stephenson

Tualatin, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 36W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mark Stephenson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
L
2026-07-26 · SHC-Beilstein/Hlady · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristen Fisher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-25 · SHC-Beilstein/Hlady · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Toni Kidd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-05 · SHC-Beilstein/Hlady · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Hlady mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Matthew Trank championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
John Williams / Craig Fager
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Hector M Salomon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-15 · SHC-Cosart · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Russ DeMoss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-07 · SHC-Cosart · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Trank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-24 · SHC-Cosart · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bill Rhoades
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-04-08 · SHC-Cosart · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Trank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Michael Gibbons / Matt Thayer
2025-11-29 · N OR-SHC-Farrell · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Trank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-09-13 · N OR-SHC-Farrell · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-07 · N OR-SHC-Farrell · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Heck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
51.9%
14W–13L · 54.4% of games
8.0
66.7%
18W–9L · 58.8% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 43.6% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 49% of the time
#3 Doubles
49%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer