Teams

NOR-MPRC-Dudley

2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.95 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Leigh Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.90
Carrie Fisher
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.86
Emily McBride
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.85
Jeroen Swanborn
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.80
Patty Kleckner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.80
Patrick Trank
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
David Hoiland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.67
Rebecca Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Ken Avenoso
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.45
Lynn Sosa
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.25
Steve Scharfstein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Leigh Anderson
54W–22L career
0%93%7%
3.92
4
Carrie Fisher
135W–80L career
0%96%4%
3.90
4
Emily McBride
72W–73L career
0%98%2%
3.86
4
Jeroen Swanborn
67W–46L career
0%96%4%
3.85
4
Patty Kleckner
55W–23L career
0%99%1%
3.80
4
Patrick Trank
87W–59L career
1%98%1%
3.80
4
David Hoiland
135W–59L career
0%100%0%
3.77
4
Rebecca Jones
65W–61L career
4%96%0%
3.67
4
Ken Avenoso
69W–67L career
4%96%0%
3.67
4
Lynn Sosa
73W–57L career
49%51%0%
3.45
3.5
Steve Scharfstein
8W–19L career · type S
8%87%5%
3.25

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.