THPRD-Mohr

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.95 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78

Jill Sather

usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4

3.71

Paula Petrica

usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4

3.60

Ashley Schneider

usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4

3.59

Kelly Mohr

usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4

3.59

Dongju Won

usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4

3.57

Hong Jones

usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4

3.52

Flor Harrigan

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.52

Angelina Warriner

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4

3.39

Rie Sasakawa

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4

3.35

Lily Looi

usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4

3.34

Angie Urrutia

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

Jill Sather

45W–75L career

0%99%1%

3.78

Paula Petrica

54W–29L career

2%97%0%

3.71

Ashley Schneider

36W–30L career

18%82%0%

3.60

Kelly Mohr

114W–55L career

11%89%0%

3.59

Dongju Won

67W–50L career

14%86%0%

3.59

Hong Jones

26W–50L career

21%79%0%

3.57

Flor Harrigan

80W–72L career

26%74%0%

3.52

Angelina Warriner

91W–55L career

29%71%0%

3.52

Rie Sasakawa

129W–121L career

66%34%0%

3.39

Lily Looi

77W–80L career

77%23%0%

3.35

3.5

Angie Urrutia

72W–39L career

0%98%2%

3.34

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.