← Teams

VTC-Chiu

2026 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.96 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Juan Li
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.80
Minou Chau
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.78
Liz DelPlato
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Nick Redwood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
—
Robert Palena
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Hisayoshi Watanabe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Aman Wasu
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Alex Harbell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.41
Cindy Rushall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.30
Jim Wheeler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Stephen Crook
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Heidi Palena
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Juan Li
117W–72L career
1%98%1%
4.21
4.5
Minou Chau
115W–106L career
69%31%0%
3.80
4
Liz DelPlato
124W–99L career
0%99%0%
3.78
4
Nick Redwood
38W–8L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Robert Palena
24W–22L career
not enough data
—
4
Hisayoshi Watanabe
56W–55L career
3%96%0%
3.72
4
Aman Wasu
24W–31L career
6%94%0%
3.69
4
Alex Harbell
127W–53L career
4%96%0%
3.69
4
Cindy Rushall
100W–170L career
60%40%0%
3.41
3.5
Jim Wheeler
60W–69L career
0%98%1%
3.30
3.5
Stephen Crook
55W–66L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3.5
Heidi Palena
79W–62L career
3%96%0%
3.20

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.