← Teams

WHRC-Saxena

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.27 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Emily Qi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.45
Karen Harlow
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.28
Janet Ha
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.21
Parul Saxena
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Mihee Park
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
3.20
Inge Marshall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Vicki Mark
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3
3.11
Li Tang
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 3
3.11
Mihye Ko
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.03
Ann Kitchen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.87
Liz Theeuws
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Emily Qi
87W–54L career
0%83%17%
3.49
3.5
Karen Harlow
79W–58L career
0%90%10%
3.45
3.5
Janet Ha
105W–56L career
0%99%0%
3.28
3.5
Parul Saxena
36W–43L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3
Mihee Park
146W–88L career
0%19%81%
3.21
3.5
Inge Marshall
58W–32L career
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Vicki Mark
46W–38L career
0%35%65%
3.16
3
Li Tang
42W–12L career
0%49%51%
3.11
3
Mihye Ko
98W–51L career
0%50%50%
3.11
3.5
Ann Kitchen
27W–36L career
30%70%0%
3.03
3
Liz Theeuws
29W–59L career
0%96%4%
2.87

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.