Search

Monet Hammond

Lake Oswego, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
44 matches · 34W–10L · seasons 20212026
Where Monet sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

Monet is one of 1468 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 33% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Monet has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022, 2025, 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Monet has gone from the 91st to the 92nd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
100%
9W–0L · 69.9% of games
3.0
87%
20W–3L · 66.7% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history44 matches
W
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Wang
+0.030better than expected — took 56% of games against 43% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Carmen Timberlake / Patty Booth
2025-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becky Coder
+0.004better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-03-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marie Claire Dunne
+0.046better than expected — took 80% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Margaret Huff / Kathi Hermanski
2025-01-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Lo
+0.067better than expected — took 92% of games against 55% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Melissa Buis / Alejandra Reyeschamps
2024-08-24 · #1 Doubles · with Melanie Morris
+0.031better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2024-08-23 · #2 Doubles · with Robin Bowerfind
+0.010about as expected — took 43% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2024-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with MICHELLE LY
0.018below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
2024-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becky Coder
+0.017better than expected — took 56% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
2024-07-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shaun Anderson
0.030about as expected — took 71% of games against 74% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2024-06-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Bracelin
+0.007about as expected — took 62% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2024-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie Morris
+0.042better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Philberta Leung / Marissa Franck
2024-05-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marie Claire Dunne
+0.028better than expected — took 71% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.