← Search

Felicity Womer

Shelton, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
98 matches · 60W–38L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.87
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
95%
stay 3.0
5%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.82. Lower than today’s 2.87 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
485 of 755

Felicity is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Felicity has been a steady 3.0 across all 8 seasons on record.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Felicity has gone from the 84th to the 73rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
69.8%
37W–16L · 60.1% of games
3.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.5% of games
6.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
52.4%
11W–10L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history98 matches
L
Erin Fischer / Sonja Larson - Williams
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Grippo
−0.036below expectation — took 46% of games against 60% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
Vanessa Carlson / Kelsie Miller
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ellen Stagnone
+0.006better than expected — took 65% of games against 60% expected
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-03-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzana Bulatovic
−0.027below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-02-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hyo Han
+0.027better than expected — took 63% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-12-07 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellen Stagnone
−0.018below expectation — took 50% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-01 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debra Stephens
−0.028below expectation — took 63% of games against 69% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-10-25 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with BENJAMIN MERRIFIELD
+0.000below expectation — took 39% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Jared Hedges / Ellen Chappelkamixed
2025-10-18 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with BENJAMIN MERRIFIELD
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Anne Marie Stedham / Heidi Lakey
2025-10-12 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie Peters
−0.027below expectation — took 58% of games against 66% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hyo Han
−0.036below expectation — took 29% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Michele Capestany / Cindy Atkison
2025-07-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mi Ae Kim
−0.042below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barron Willis
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.