Teams

Kim-Smash Squad

2025 One Doubles-Summer · 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-09vs Walz/BrittWon 10
W#1 DoublesHyo Han / Mi Ae Kim vs Maileen Walz / Carmen Britt6-3, 6-2
2025-07-30vs Quesada-Court QueensWon 10
W#1 DoublesHyo Han / Mi Ae Kim vs Teresa Avila / Stacie Nemetz6-4, 7-6
2025-07-15vs Artman - Dream TeamLost 01
L#1 DoublesHyo Han / Felicity Womer vs Alicia Schmitz / Anneliese Johnson1-6, 4-6
2025-07-02vs Baumgardner-Doubles or NothingLost 01
L#1 DoublesMi Ae Kim / Felicity Womer vs Michele Capestany / Cindy Atkison4-6, 1-6
2025-06-18vs Gerritzen/Marston - AndiamoWon 10
W#1 DoublesToti Walia / Denise Gentzler vs Shannon Gerritzen / Erika Sagle1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-12vs Koeppen-Double TroubleLost 01
L#1 DoublesToti Walia / Denise Gentzler vs Nancy Koeppen / Tina Mapili4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#1 DoublesHyo Han / Denise Gentzler vs Caroline Thompson / Jillian Strayer6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SWW-Crook7070239
2Koeppen-Double Trouble7070350
3Belous-Dynamic Synergy6161253
4Gerritzen/Marston - Andiamo5252652
5Manary/Schmidt4343658
6Kim-Smash Squad4343764
7White/Coovert4343751
8Artman - Dream Team3434870
9Pawlitschek/Strayer-Fight Club Champs3434975
10Quesada-Court Queens34341073
11Baumgardner-Doubles or Nothing25251072
12McPhee/King25251063
13Holien-Busters25251173
14Bailey/Martinson25251178
15Walz/Britt16161273
16Cruz-Chill Out16161377

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Mi Ae Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Denise Gentzler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Toti Walia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Felicity Womer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Hyo Han
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Felicity Womer + Denise Gentzler5167% games+9.1% vs expected
Mi Ae Kim + Hyo Han10157% games+6.3% vs expected
Denise Gentzler + Hyo Han7358% games+5.1% vs expected
Mi Ae Kim + Denise Gentzler033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mi Ae Kim
70W–67L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Denise Gentzler
46W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Toti Walia
22W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
2.83
3
Felicity Womer
60W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Hyo Han
61W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.