Teams

Baumgardner-Doubles or Nothing

2025 One Doubles-Summer · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.08 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-07vs Walz/BrittWon 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Abegg / Cindy Atkison vs Carmen Britt / Maileen Walz6-3, 6-4
2025-08-06vs Koeppen-Double TroubleLost 01
L#1 DoublesSharon Abegg / Michele Capestany vs Violet Clerget / Nancy Koeppen7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-31vs Quesada-Court QueensLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathy Pace / Marny Howell vs Teresa Avila / Stacie Nemetz1-6, 2-6
2025-07-29vs Artman - Dream TeamLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathy Baumgardner / Marny Howell vs Elizabeth McDougall / Leslie Artman6-7, 5-7
2025-07-02vs Kim-Smash SquadWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Capestany / Cindy Atkison vs Mi Ae Kim / Felicity Womer6-4, 6-1
L#1 DoublesKathy Pace / Marny Howell vs Caroline Thompson / Jillian Strayer6-7, 4-6
2025-06-17vs Gerritzen/Marston - AndiamoLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathy Baumgardner / Michele Capestany vs Danielle Marston / Shannon Gerritzen3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SWW-Crook7070239
2Koeppen-Double Trouble7070350
3Belous-Dynamic Synergy6161253
4Gerritzen/Marston - Andiamo5252652
5Manary/Schmidt4343658
6Kim-Smash Squad4343764
7White/Coovert4343751
8Artman - Dream Team3434870
9Pawlitschek/Strayer-Fight Club Champs3434975
10Quesada-Court Queens34341073
11Baumgardner-Doubles or Nothing25251072
12McPhee/King25251063
13Holien-Busters25251173
14Bailey/Martinson25251178
15Walz/Britt16161273
16Cruz-Chill Out16161377

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Cindy Atkison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Sharon Abegg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Kathy Pace
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Marny Howell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Michele Capestany
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.12
Kathy Baumgardner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Abegg + Michele Capestany4454% games+7.8% vs expected
Michele Capestany + Cindy Atkison3441% games−6.5% vs expected
Michele Capestany + Kathy Pace213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindy Atkison
35W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
3.5
Sharon Abegg
77W–109L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Kathy Pace
24W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Marny Howell
29W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Michele Capestany
107W–111L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
2.5
Kathy Baumgardner
21W–73L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.