Teams

Holien-Busters

2025 One Doubles-Summer · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.12 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-29vs White/CoovertLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Chappelka / Alexa Ballesteros vs Kristin Coovert / Amy White1-6, 4-6
2025-07-20vs Cruz-Chill OutWon 10
W#1 DoublesRachel Stevenson / Ellen Chappelka vs Jaime Brucker / Lee Anna Bonds2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-07-13vs McPhee/KingLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlexa Ballesteros / Ellen Chappelka vs Lucy Davis / Rebecca Hinman1-6, 1-6
2025-07-02vs Bailey/MartinsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Holien / Rachel Stevenson vs Bobbie Bailey / Emily Martinson7-5, 6-2
2025-06-30vs Belous-Dynamic SynergyLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Chappelka / Vicky Dinh vs Kris Furrer / Heather Goffrier3-6, 2-6
2025-06-22vs Manary/SchmidtLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlexandra Holien / Vicky Dinh vs Tashi Schmidt / Kellie Manary4-6, 3-6
2025-06-09vs SWW-CrookLost 01
L#1 DoublesMehtap Hill / Alexa Ballesteros vs Morgann Crook / Maria Smith0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SWW-Crook7070239
2Koeppen-Double Trouble7070350
3Belous-Dynamic Synergy6161253
4Gerritzen/Marston - Andiamo5252652
5Manary/Schmidt4343658
6Kim-Smash Squad4343764
7White/Coovert4343751
8Artman - Dream Team3434870
9Pawlitschek/Strayer-Fight Club Champs3434975
10Quesada-Court Queens34341073
11Baumgardner-Doubles or Nothing25251072
12McPhee/King25251063
13Holien-Busters25251173
14Bailey/Martinson25251178
15Walz/Britt16161273
16Cruz-Chill Out16161377

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Rachel Stevenson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.84
Vicky Dinh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Ellen Chappelka
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Alexa Ballesteros
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Alexandra Holien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Mehtap Hill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexandra Holien + Vicky Dinh3252% games−0.8% vs expected
Alexandra Holien + Rachel Stevenson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Rachel Stevenson
48W–34L career · type A · 7 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Vicky Dinh
19W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
Ellen Chappelka
20W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Alexa Ballesteros
9W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Alexandra Holien
36W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Mehtap Hill
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.