Search

Cindy Atkison

Olympia, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
54 matches · 35W–19L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.03
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
37%
down to 3.0
63%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 22% down · 78% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.06. Higher than today’s 3.03 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Olympia · 3.5
48 of 50
WA · 3.5
1413 of 1460

Cindy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cindy has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 3 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.5202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Cindy has gone from the 98th to the 8th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 62.5% of games
3.5
66.7%
14W–7L · 60.2% of games
6.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 67.6% of games
7.0
0%
0W–4L · 31.9% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history54 matches
L
Lindsay Luppino
2026-03-14 · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.027below expectation — took 14% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Kim Ballesteros / Angie Post
2026-03-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcia Beauchamp
0.079below expectation — took 0% of games against 47% expected
0-1
L
Kim Ballesteros / Malissa Quarterman
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Anne Bonnot
0.034below expectation — took 28% of games against 46% expected
6-0, 7-5
W
Julie Heller / Rene Boven
2026-02-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ute Kleemann-Sportschuetz
+0.039better than expected — took 67% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Ruth Anne Bonnot / Kim Ballesteros
2026-02-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joanne Munzar
+0.005about as expected — took 48% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Lindsay Luppino
2026-02-07 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.053below expectation — took 14% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Kat Savage / Liz Smith
2026-01-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gretchen Webb
0.004about as expected — took 45% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2025-11-23 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Gentzler
+0.019better than expected — took 100% of games against 76% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Amy Armstrong / Shelley Siutschamps
2025-11-08 · #1 Doubles · with Ellen Stagnone
0.045below expectation — took 29% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Gina Thompson / Michelle Hylandchamps
2025-11-07 · #1 Doubles · with Ellen Stagnone
+0.016about as expected — took 29% of games against 30% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-11-01 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellen Stagnone
+0.011better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-10-26 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Capestany
0.082below expectation — took 14% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.