Teams

CCGA/Cindy Atkinson

2026 GIT USTA Adult 55 & Over - Winter 2026 · Women 3.5 Thursdays 10:00 a.m.

16 players · average NTRP 3.33 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-12vs GIT/Lauren HainesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesShannon Floyd / Gretchen Webb vs Liz Smith / Ruth Anne Bonnot1-0
W#2 DoublesMarcia Beauchamp / Cindy Atkison vs Kim Ballesteros / Angie Post0-1
2026-03-05vs GIT/Lauren HainesLost 02
L#1 DoublesUte Kleemann-Sportschuetz / Kathryn Grace vs Lauren Haines / Angie Post2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTrish Rugaber / Marcia Beauchamp vs Janie Doroff / Danielle Davis3-6, 0-6
2026-02-26vs GIT/Lauren HainesWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathryn Grace / Ute Kleemann-Sportschuetz vs Ruth Anne Bonnot / Lauren Haines6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGretchen Webb / Leslie Suddath vs Tina Daniel / Danielle Davis5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarcia Beauchamp / Trish Rugaber vs Cheryl Helton / Julie Heller5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-02-19vs GIT/Lauren HainesLost 12
L#1 DoublesCheryl Keefer / Karen Hufnagel vs Kim Ballesteros / Tina Daniel1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathryn Grace / Joanne Munzar vs Lauren Haines / Janie Doroff3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesCindy Atkison / Ute Kleemann-Sportschuetz vs Julie Heller / Rene Boven6-3, 6-3
2026-02-12vs GIT/Lauren HainesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCindy Atkison / Joanne Munzar vs Ruth Anne Bonnot / Kim Ballesteros4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGretchen Webb / Shannon Floyd vs Liz Smith / Lauren Haines6-2, 6-1
2026-01-29vs GIT/Lauren HainesLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeslie Suddath / Gretchen Webb vs Tina Daniel / Liz Smith2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJoanne Munzar / Kathryn Grace vs Danielle Davis / Janie Doroff7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesUte Kleemann-Sportschuetz / Cindy Paxton vs Cheryl Helton / Kaarin MacKinnon6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-01-22vs GIT/Lauren HainesLost 02
L#1 DoublesJackie Seymour / Cindy Paxton vs Kat Savage / Tina Daniel2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Hufnagel / Cheryl Keefer vs Kim Ballesteros / Liz Smith4-6, 0-6
2026-01-15vs GIT/Lauren HainesLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoanne Munzar / Gretchen Webb vs Tina Daniel / Danielle Davis5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathryn Grace / Cindy Paxton vs Barbara Collier / Cheryl Helton6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Hufnagel / Trish Rugaber vs Kim Ballesteros / Rene Boven3-6, 1-6
2026-01-08vs GIT/Lauren HainesLost 03
L#1 DoublesCindy Atkison / Gretchen Webb vs Kat Savage / Liz Smith3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoanne Munzar / Jackie Seymour vs Tina Daniel / Barbara Collier1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesUte Kleemann-Sportschuetz / Cindy Paxton vs Kaarin MacKinnon / Danielle Davis7-5, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 3.5 Thursdays 10:00 a.m.
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GIT/Lauren Haines8121620192
2CCGA/Cindy Atkinson1852246290

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Cindy Paxton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.03
Kathryn Grace
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.90
Cindy Atkison
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.87
Leslie Suddath
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Gretchen Webb
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Marcia Beauchamp
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Trish Rugaber
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Cheryl Keefer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Marci High
published
2.51
Ute Kleemann-Sportschuetz
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.35
Karen Hufnagel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.27
Joanne Munzar
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Jackie Seymour
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jackie Walsh
published
Peaches Thorp
published
Shannon Floyd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindy Paxton
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.07
Kathryn Grace
2W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03
3.5
Cindy Atkison
35W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.90
Leslie Suddath
14W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.87
Gretchen Webb
14W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Marcia Beauchamp
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.75
Trish Rugaber
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
2.71
3
Cheryl Keefer
6W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
Marci High
11W–17L career · no lines in 2026
0%35%65%
2.56
Ute Kleemann-Sportschuetz
8W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%48%52%
2.51
Karen Hufnagel
4W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
2.35
Joanne Munzar
3W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Jackie Seymour
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jackie Walsh
4W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Peaches Thorp
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Shannon Floyd
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.