Teams

Quesada-Court Queens

2025 One Doubles-Summer · 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-31vs Baumgardner-Doubles or NothingWon 10
W#1 DoublesTeresa Avila / Stacie Nemetz vs Kathy Pace / Marny Howell6-1, 6-2
2025-07-30vs Kim-Smash SquadLost 01
L#1 DoublesTeresa Avila / Stacie Nemetz vs Hyo Han / Mi Ae Kim4-6, 6-7
2025-07-30vs Koeppen-Double TroubleLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Quesada / Jennifer Stockstad vs Tina Mapili / Violet Clerget1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-07-28vs Walz/BrittWon 10
W#1 DoublesKarina Spellman / Jennifer Stockstad vs Carmen Britt / Maileen Walz7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-17vs Artman - Dream TeamLost 01
L#1 DoublesTeresa Avila / Jennifer Stockstad vs Elizabeth McDougall / Leslie Artman2-6, 0-6
2025-06-30vs Gerritzen/Marston - AndiamoLost 01
L#1 DoublesStacie Nemetz / Karina Spellman vs Danielle Marston / Erika Sagle2-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesStacie Nemetz / Karina Spellman vs Jennifer Weber / Maya Pawlitschek4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SWW-Crook7070239
2Koeppen-Double Trouble7070350
3Belous-Dynamic Synergy6161253
4Gerritzen/Marston - Andiamo5252652
5Manary/Schmidt4343658
6Kim-Smash Squad4343764
7White/Coovert4343751
8Artman - Dream Team3434870
9Pawlitschek/Strayer-Fight Club Champs3434975
10Quesada-Court Queens34341073
11Baumgardner-Doubles or Nothing25251072
12McPhee/King25251063
13Holien-Busters25251173
14Bailey/Martinson25251178
15Walz/Britt16161273
16Cruz-Chill Out16161377

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Teresa Avila
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Jennifer Stockstad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Stacie Nemetz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Julie Quesada
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Karina Spellman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacie Nemetz + Jennifer Stockstad3357% games+6.3% vs expected
Stacie Nemetz + Teresa Avila9656% games+5.0% vs expected
Jennifer Stockstad + Julie Quesada4651% games+2.7% vs expected
Teresa Avila + Karina Spellman2347% games−3.6% vs expected
Stacie Nemetz + Karina Spellman2640% games−3.7% vs expected
Stacie Nemetz + Julie Quesada101645% games−3.9% vs expected
Julie Quesada + Karina Spellman2443% games−7.1% vs expected
Teresa Avila + Julie Quesada033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Teresa Avila
36W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Jennifer Stockstad
21W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.85
3
Stacie Nemetz
53W–70L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Julie Quesada
27W–50L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Karina Spellman
31W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.