Search

Wendy Carlson

Lake Oswego, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
66 matches · 41W–25L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.78
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Lake Oswego · 3.0
32 of 52
OR · 3.0
383 of 600

Wendy is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Wendy has been a steady 3.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

2.53.0202220242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Wendy has gone from the 73rd to the 67th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
60%
6W–4L · 53.8% of games
6.0
72.2%
26W–10L · 58.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history66 matches
L
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Susan Bradley
+0.048better than expected — took 42% of games against 28% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Carilyn Alexander / Patricia Dorsa
2026-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Ann Davidson
+0.043better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Carol Bremner
0.014below expectation — took 14% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Dinah Adkins / Beth Traphagen
2026-05-08 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Ballard
+0.012better than expected — took 48% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
Dorothy Rodegerdts / Sanae Ito
2026-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Bremner
+0.001about as expected — took 53% of games against 53% expected
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-09-13 · #1 Doubles · with Susan Bradley
+0.002about as expected — took 35% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Pam Rasanen / Debra Breenchamps
2025-09-12 · #2 Doubles · with Susan Bradley
0.006about as expected — took 42% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Jan Shuel / Jennilyn Evanschamps
2025-09-11 · #1 Doubles · with Susan Bradley
0.043below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Rita DeWeese / Jan Levine
2025-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Bradley
0.001better than expected — took 75% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Bradley
+0.012better than expected — took 92% of games against 73% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Christina Gibson / Carilyn Alexander
2025-03-25 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Bradley
+0.010about as expected — took 57% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Marie Claire Dunne / Monet Hammond
2025-03-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Douglas
0.050below expectation — took 20% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.