← Search

Alma Siri

Aurora, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 72W–37L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Alma Siri to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
W
2026-09-12 · CHARB-Snyder/Siri · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Siri mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-01 · CHARB-Wall/Siri · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Siri mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · Ace holes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Petersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-13 · Ace holes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Petersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-09 · Ace holes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynne Gaerisch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-21 · CHARB-Wall/Siri · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Siri mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-29 · LOTC-Wall/Swanborn · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-26 · LOTC-Wall/Swanborn · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Siri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-24 · CHARB-Trank/Siri · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-04-19 · CHARB-Trank/Siri · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Henry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-04-18 · LOTC-Wall/Swanborn · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-03-27 · LOTC-Wall/Swanborn · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Wall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
65%
26W–14L · 57.6% of games
3.5
85.3%
29W–5L · 62.3% of games
4.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 49.8% of games
6.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 51.1% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
50 matches
#1 Singles
26%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
13 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer