Search

Jennifer Petersen

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
166 matches · 85W–81L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.77
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.0
83 of 266
OR · 4.0
154 of 498

Jennifer is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jennifer has been 4.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.02021202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jennifer has gone from the 76th to the 58th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.1% of games
4.0
52.3%
57W–52L · 53.4% of games
4.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 50.3% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
27.8%
5W–13L · 43.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history166 matches
L
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alma Siri
+0.009about as expected — took 45% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alma Siri
+0.016better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Wall
+0.018better than expected — took 44% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria Siri
+0.006about as expected — took 47% of games against 44% expected
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Johana Cunliffe
2026-06-24 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.038below expectation — took 29% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Kyle Robertson
2026-06-17 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.055below expectation — took 25% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Lindsay Kelsochamps
2026-06-13 · #1 Singles
0.025below expectation — took 55% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Anakristel Paynechamps
2026-06-13 · #1 Singles
+0.024better than expected — took 80% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Martha Eugenia Gomez Bacachamps
2026-06-12 · #1 Singles
+0.036better than expected — took 86% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Mary Lu Bushnellchamps
2026-06-12 · #1 Singles
+0.004better than expected — took 71% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Adriane Whitchurch
2026-06-11 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.024below expectation — took 41% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Susannah Whelan
2026-06-10 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.019better than expected — took 63% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.