Teams

NAZ/Murrieta/40&over/4.0W

2026 Adult 40 & Over - NAZ · NAZ 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-10vs FlagstaffSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLiz Murrieta / Jennifer Petersen vs Serena Unrein / Lynn Matthews6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesTemmy Bowler vs Laurel Nelson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesShawna Hodovance / Vickie Fox-Weeks vs Allison Bates / Esther Spravzoff3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBea Demel / Debbi Cassidy vs Kirsten Aamodt / Dana Jacko6-1, 6-4
2026-05-10vs FlagstaffWon 31
L#1 DoublesTemmy Bowler / Diane Brock vs Laurel Nelson / Serena Unrein3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Petersen vs Joanna Cook6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBea Demel / Cheryl Murrieta vs Allison Bates / Helen McCallum7-6, 1-2
W#3 DoublesVickie Fox-Weeks / Vanessa Scheu vs Kirsten Aamodt / Elizabeth Desy6-3, 6-3
2026-04-12vs FlagstaffWon 31
W#1 DoublesLiz Murrieta / Temmy Bowler vs Helen McCallum / Dana Jacko6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAndrea Meyer vs Laurel Nelson6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesShawna Hodovance / Diane Brock vs Elizabeth Desy / Tracey Tibbs6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDebbi Cassidy / Vanessa Scheu vs Mary Joy Perry / Kathy Cox6-3, 6-4
2026-04-12vs FlagstaffLost 13
W#1 DoublesLiz Murrieta / Debbi Cassidy vs Elizabeth Desy / Helen McCallum6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAndrea Meyer vs Laurel Nelson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTemmy Bowler / Shawna Hodovance vs Esther Spravzoff / Lynn Matthews6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Brock / Adriana Armesto Howard vs Kathy Cox / Tracey Tibbs7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2026-04-11vs FlagstaffSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCheryl Murrieta / Vickie Fox-Weeks vs Helen McCallum / Laurel Nelson3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTemmy Bowler vs Joanna Cook1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDebbi Cassidy / Kim Vallen vs Dana Jacko / Mary Joy Perry6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLiz Murrieta / Andrea Meyer vs Kathy Cox / Lynn Matthews6-1, 6-3
2026-04-11vs FlagstaffSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCheryl Murrieta / Temmy Bowler vs Lynn Matthews / Helen McCallum7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAdriana Armesto Howard vs Laurel Nelson3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDebbi Cassidy / Vickie Fox-Weeks vs Dana Jacko / Mary Joy Perry6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLiz Murrieta / Andrea Meyer vs Esther Spravzoff / Elizabeth Desy6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · NAZ 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NAZ/Murrieta/40&over/4.0W06131123208
2Flagstaff06111328221

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Andrea Meyer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.86
Jennifer Petersen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.72
Bea Demel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Liz Murrieta
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.62
Temmy Bowler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.57
Shawna Hodovance
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Kim Vallen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Adriana Armesto Howard
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.39
Debbi Cassidy
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.38
Vickie Fox-Weeks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
Diane Brock
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.25
Vanessa Scheu
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.13
Cheryl Murrieta
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Brock + Adriana Armesto Howard3549% games+8.7% vs expected
Adriana Armesto Howard + Debbi Cassidy1643% games+4.3% vs expected
Shawna Hodovance + Debbi Cassidy3648% games−1.2% vs expected
Diane Brock + Debbi Cassidy41641% games−7.2% vs expected
Cheryl Murrieta + Diane Brock1633% games−13.5% vs expected
Diane Brock + Shawna Hodovance4643% games−15.5% vs expected
Debbi Cassidy + Vickie Fox-Weeks1541% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Murrieta + Adriana Armesto Howard3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Meyer
50W–97L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Jennifer Petersen
115W–95L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Bea Demel
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.72
Liz Murrieta
33W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.68
Temmy Bowler
49W–39L career · 6 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.62
Shawna Hodovance
16W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.57
Kim Vallen
66W–53L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
4
Adriana Armesto Howard
15W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
3.40
4
Debbi Cassidy
36W–62L career · 5 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
3.39
Vickie Fox-Weeks
75W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
3.38
4
Diane Brock
34W–87L career · 3 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
3.36
Vanessa Scheu
32W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
4
Cheryl Murrieta
22W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.