Teams

CHARB-Wall/Siri

2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.55 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Jonathan Quon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Alma Siri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Don Mcbride
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.48
Bill Rhoades
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.32
Karen Groenweghe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Christine Wall
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.20
Ron Press
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Christine Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.94
Joseph Siri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
JAMES KYUNG
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.57
Karla Hendrickson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Jonathan Quon
69W–67L career
1%97%2%
3.78
3.5
Alma Siri
70W–37L career
0%65%35%
3.56
4
Don Mcbride
2W–14L career · type S
37%63%0%
3.49
4
Bill Rhoades
79W–87L career
38%62%0%
3.48
3.5
Karen Groenweghe
82W–81L career
0%98%2%
3.32
4
Christine Wall
81W–92L career
93%7%0%
3.27
3.5
Ron Press
40W–41L career
2%98%0%
3.20
3.5
Christine Taylor
47W–49L career · type A
23%77%0%
3.04
3
Joseph Siri
45W–38L career
0%89%11%
2.94
3
JAMES KYUNG
52W–66L career
0%98%2%
2.86
3
Karla Hendrickson
41W–109L career
17%83%0%
2.57

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.