Search

Zak Kapla

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
43 matches · 19W–24L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.95
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 21 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
73%
stay 3.0
27%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 93% stay · 7% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.88. Lower than today’s 2.95 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
106 of 357
OR · 3.0
176 of 600

Zak is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams11 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Zak has been 3.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Zak has gone from the 81st to the 29th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
0.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.3% of games
3.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 47.7% of games
6.0
25%
1W–3L · 40% of games
7.0
0%
0W–4L · 20% of games
0.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 71.4% of games
6.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 37% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history43 matches
L
2026-07-19 · VTC-Lord/Thoreson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karissa Ditgen
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-18 · VTC-Lord/Thoreson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Hiroe Felix
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Xin Shu / Calvin Liang
2026-07-15 · Game Sets Laughs · #2 Mixed Doubles · 0.0 · with Mollie Peters
+0.035better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
8-2
W
James Shippy / Clay Creps
2026-07-14 · Game Sets Laughs · #1 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with Allan He
+0.036better than expected — took 80% of games against 58% expected
8-2
L
2026-07-11 · VTC-Lord/Thoreson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristin Case
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Bob Winthrop / Brandon Coston
2026-07-08 · Game Sets Laughs · #1 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with Allan He
+0.093better than expected — took 100% of games against 50% expected
8-0
W
Jann Purdy / Chris Krantzmixed
2026-06-21 · VTC-Lord/Thoreson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karissa Ditgen
+0.000better than expected — took 52% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Greg Passmore / Ian Sheppard
2026-06-13 · CGM-Szueber/Thoreson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Hubka
+0.029better than expected — took 59% of games against 46% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Hyunsu Kim / JUN KYU PARK
2026-06-07 · CGM-Szueber/Thoreson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chuck Lantz
0.022below expectation — took 38% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-06 · CGM-Szueber/Thoreson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chuck Lantz
0.017below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Gijun Lee / Byoungsoo Ham
2026-05-10 · CGM-Szueber/Thoreson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Hubka
+0.058better than expected — took 75% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-18 · CGM-Szueber/Thoreson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Roberts
0.042below expectation — took 35% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.